Legal Opinion

People v. Protsman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 3, 1978No. 28041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

The appellant, Eugene Albert Protsman, appeals the denial of his Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. We affirm.

Appellant was originally charged with seven counts of second degree forgery, a class 4 felony. He pled guilty to count one and the remainder were nolle pros sed.

At the providency hearing the district attorney tendered to the court an authenticated copy of a former felony conviction of appellant. The trial judge advised the appellant that, pursuant to section 16-11-101(1) (d), C.R.S. 1973 (1976 Supp.),1 his prior felony conviction could affect his sentence.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. LipinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. People v. LipinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API