Legal Opinion
Donovan v. City of Haverhill
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 15, 2002No. 02-1279PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Janet and Thomas Donovan (“the Donovans”), appeal from the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants-appel-lees. 1 After a thorough review of parties’ briefs and the record, we affirm the district court’s determination for the reasons stated below.
I. Background
On June 14, 2000, the Donovans submitted an application to move their house on a public road in Haverhill. The city responded with a list of requirements that the Donovans would have to meet before the permit could issue, such as having the telephone…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- URI Student Senate v. Town of NarragansettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Patterson v. American Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Providence Teachers' Union Local 958 v. City Council of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.