Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 1984No. 83-1255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The state appealed a pretrial order excluding hearsay statements of alleged co-conspirators. Such an order is not ap-pealable under rule 9.140(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and grant it.

Respondent was charged with first degree murder; he was not charged with the crime of conspiracy. Respondent’s original trial ended in a mistrial. Thereafter, the state filed a motion in limine, seeking a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of hearsay statements made by alleged co-conspirators Pauline and Leroy Wilson.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Resnick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Briklod v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API