Legal Opinion
Rox Riv 83 Partners v. Ettinger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover rents allegedly due, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated February 16, 1996, as denied its motion for summary judgment and granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint on the ground of accord and satisfaction.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint on the ground of accord and satisfaction and substituting *390…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Willard Van Dyke Productions, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Mance v. . HossingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- City of New York v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Van Dyke Productions, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Miter Realty Corp. v. AT&T Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rox Riv 83 Partners v. EttingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Hermany Farms, Inc. v. ChapinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001