Legal Opinion

Perdomo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1990No. 89-02106PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Judge.

The appellant, Miguel Perdomo, while a prisoner in a state correctional institution, was convicted of aggravated battery on a fellow inmate and possession of contraband (a knife) in a penal institution. He appeals the convictions contending that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to conduct a hearing pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), when a discovery violation surfaced at trial. We reverse.

The discovery violation about which the appellant complains concerned the clothing that he was wearing at the time he was taken into custody by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Duest v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ANTHONY FERRARI v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. ANTHONY FERRARI v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Hrehor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. State v. DecoseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API