Legal Opinion

Bernier v. Fredette

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 6, 2014No. 12-P-1684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

This boundary dispute originates from deeds granted beginning in 1870 and requires us to locate the common boundary between the plaintiffs’ and defendants’ Acushnet properties. The plaintiffs commenced this action seeking to remove a cloud on their title pursuant to G. L. c. 240, §§ 6-10, seeking a declaration of the correct location of their common boundary, and seeking damages for trespass and nuisance. The defendants filed counterclaims for trespass and nuisance.

Following a three-day trial and a view of the relevant properties and monuments, the Land Court judge adopted the boundary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Temple v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buccaneer Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  2. Buccaneer Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  3. Chapman v. PenbsivyMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
  4. Kennedy v. Osmanski, IIIDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API