Legal Opinion

In re Brooks' Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to St. Clair; Vance, J. • John Edward Jenkinson appealed from an order of the probate court denying his petition for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of George Brooks, deceased. From an order dismissing the appeal, petitioner brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

John Edward Jenkinson, an infant, by his next friend, filed a petition for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of his grandfather, alleging that he died intestate, and that, at the time of his death, he was possessed of real and personal estate, estimated at the respective values of $50,000 and $3,000.

A- point is made that the publication was not sufficient, but it does not appear to be argued. As the appellee appeared and contested the application, she cannot be heard to complain. She filed an answer, stating, in substance, that, previous to his death, the intestate conveyed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hubbell v. BlandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re Estate of NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. William S. Hungerford v. John SigersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. In re the Appeal of McCartyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Barlass v. BarlassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gale v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. In Re Halsted's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API