Legal Opinion

People v. Sweeney

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 22, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bruce Allen, J.

The issue in this case is whether the allotted time for holding a defendant in custody under CPL 180.80 should be extended briefly to afford the prosecutor the opportunity to present the case to a Grand Jury. For the reasons stated below, I conclude that such an extension is warranted.

*176CPL article 180 covers the crucial time period between arrest and preliminary disposition on felony complaints. Section 180.80 provides, in pertinent part, that a defendant who is incarcerated following his arrest must be released in 144 hours if the prosecution does not obtain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. RickertNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. MucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GegaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People ex rel. Arshack v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API