Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fagel v. Fagel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1967No. 20,501Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Faulconer, J.

— I must dissent from the majority opinion which reversed the judgment on the merits for the reason that, in my opinion, no error is properly before this court.

Appellants’ motion for new trial contains two specifications, 1) the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and 2) the decision is contrary to law. The only assignment of error is the overruling of the motion for new trial.

Appellants’ argument is limited to finding-No. 10.and conclusion of law No. 5.

*671Finding No. 10, which appellants argue is not sustained by-sufficient evidence, reads as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Edwards v. WYLLIEIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Dorweiler v. SinksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Fair Share Organization, Inc. v. Nagdeman & SonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Fagel v. FagelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API