Legal Opinion

Berry v. Boulware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1992No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: It is settled law that a party who has failed or refused to perform his contractual obligations is not entitled to specific performance of that contract (see, Grace v Nappa, 46 NY2d 560, 567, rearg denied 47 NY2d 952; Fanner Woodworking Co. v Adair, 75 AD2d 553, 554; see generally, 96 NY Jur 2d, Specific Performance, §§ 23, 24). It is uncontroverted that plaintiff defaulted on his obligation to purchase defendants’ shares of stock and that he also failed to perform the directives of a prior court order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grace v. NappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. O'NeallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Panner Woodworking Co. v. AdairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zelmanovitch v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API