Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pittington

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 2005No. 3-04-0119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schmidt

Plaintiff, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, issued a policy of insurance to defendant James Pittington. On May 7, 2000, Pittington shot defendant Pete Harrison while both were at the Pittington residence. In a separate case, Harrison’s estate filed a negligence action against Pittington seeking damages for bodily injury. Prior to the filing of the bodily injury suit, Metropolitan filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the policy of insurance issued to Pittington would not indemnify him for monetary damages stemming from the shooting of Harrison.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SavickasIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Talarico v. DunlapIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. KovarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Lindsey Dostal v. Curtis StrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Pekin Insurance Co. v. Johnson-Downs Construction Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Allstate Indemnity Company v. HieberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API