Arnold v. Anton Cooperative Ass'n
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge TAUBMAN
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority's conclusion in part II of its opinion that district and county courts have concurrent jurisdiction over *109claims brought under part 6 of the Colorado Civil Rights Act, sections 24-84-601 to -605, C.R.9S.2010. I also agree with the majority's analysis of fees and costs and appellate jurisdiction in parts V and VI, respectively. I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority's conclusion in part IILA that the trial court did not err in dismissing the breach of express contract claim of plaintiff,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Blades v. DaFoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.