Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Arnold v. Anton Cooperative Ass'n

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2011No. 09CA2422Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge TAUBMAN

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority's conclusion in part II of its opinion that district and county courts have concurrent jurisdiction over *109claims brought under part 6 of the Colorado Civil Rights Act, sections 24-84-601 to -605, C.R.9S.2010. I also agree with the majority's analysis of fees and costs and appellate jurisdiction in parts V and VI, respectively. I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority's conclusion in part IILA that the trial court did not err in dismissing the breach of express contract claim of plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Industrial Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. Blades v. DaFoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API