State Ex Rel. Holcomb v. Armstrong
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentHamley, J.
(dissenting) — Attendance at the University of Washington is not compulsory. I am therefore inclined to believe that the board of regents was not exercising the police power of the state in promulgating the regulation in question. It was simply the exercise of administrative power such as is vested in all public officers with respect to the use and occupancy of public property and the performance of official duties. If this be true, then the constitutional guarantees respecting the free exercise of religion are not directly involved. They are drawn into issue only where there is an element of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.