Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 2000No. 2D99-2520PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
752 So.2d 133 (2000)
Richard James HAMILTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D99-2520.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 8, 2000.
2Per curiam
Richard James Hamilton appeals the denial of his motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court's order because Hamilton's motion fails to meet the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998), and because the record attachments included by the trial court appear to refute the claim. Since Hamilton alleges that the attached jail…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Benitez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Campbell v. BattleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
4Cited by10 opinions
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Battles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Amos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Toto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.