Legal Opinion
Tanis v. Tanis
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 5, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Moore.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bingenheimer v. BingenheimerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949