Legal Opinion

Norman & Schaen, Inc. v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1976No. 18815PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

In this action for water damage to the contents of a building, the principal question is whether the City had a duty to avoid the damage by constructing a larger storm drain than one constructed more than forty years before the floods in question. We hold that the City had no such duty, and, consequently, that the trial court properly refused to submit special issues concerning the City’s alleged negligence in maintaining a drain with the insufficient capacity to accommodate the water expected to flow through it. We also hold that the court properly excluded testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dilley v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Dallas v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. City of Houston v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Watauga v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. City of Borger v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  3. Raburn v. KJI Bluechip InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. City of San Antonio v. De Miguel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  5. City of Cleburne v. James Davenport, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API