Ex Parte Cotton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Helen Cotton petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Horace H. Nation III to recuse himself from a case now before him in which she is the plaintiff. She contends that recusal is required under Canon of Judicial Ethics 3(C)(1) because, she says, there is an appearance of impropriety because Judge Nation was a defendant in a separate civil action and in that earlier action was represented by the same attorney that is representing the defendant in Ms. Cotton's case. Therefore, she contends that, pursuant to Advisory Opinion 88-337 issued by the Judicial Inquiry Commission on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte BalogunSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Fulton v. LongshoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rogers v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Cottrell v. NAT. COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Ex Parte CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.