Converse v. O'KEEFE
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Appellants’ appeal concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the propriety of the admission of certain evidence, and the correctness of the trial court’s charge. We find no harmful error and affirm.
Appellants, husband and wife, sued for damages brought on by a collision between a car driven by Mrs. Converse and one driven by appellee O’Keefe. The evidence introduced at trial authorized jury findings that Mrs. Converse, after having seen O’Keefe proceeding along behind her, made a sudden, unsignaled stop in order to avoid hitting a car which had halted in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Baggett v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Bryant v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Rogers v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Eiberger v. Martel Electronic Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hester v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Lissmore v. KincadeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Palmore v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- South v. SOUTH FULTON HOSPITALCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Sherrill v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.