Legal Opinion

Hampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2003No. 5D02-3829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, W., J.

Hampton appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 for post-conviction relief. He asserts a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied his motion on the sole ground that it was untimely because it was not filed within the two year time limit established by the rule. We reverse.

On July 24, 2000, Hampton pled guilty, was sentenced on various charges, and a judgment was rendered. He took no appeal. On August 19, 2002, he filed this rule 3.850 motion.

With regard to time limits, the rule provides:

A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Ayo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanfield v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  2. McQuagge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API