Legal Opinion · Dissent

R & K Corp. v. Kenmont Hat Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 12, 1956Published

1Dissent

Bergan, J. (dissenting).

The complaint fails to state any actionable cause of any kind. Although in the course of trial the plaintiff proceeded on theories which differed widely from those pleaded, arising from the proof as it developed, the complaint itself is suggestive of the marked infirmities of the grounds for relief upon which plaintiff relies to sustain this judgment, and the pleading ought to be examined as part of the frame in which this litigation is cast.

The nature of the contract as pleaded is that the plaintiff, B & K Corporation, the defendant, Kenmont Hat Co., Inc., and Sidney…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Johnson v. . OppenheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API