Edelman v. State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
We granted review to determine whether the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) exceeded its authority in promulgating WAC 390-16-311 to interpret a perceived ambiguity in RCW 42.17.660. Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeals held that the PDC exceeded its authority in making a rule that alters an unambiguous statute. We affirm.
*587BACKGROUND
In 1992, the people of Washington passed Initiative 134 (1-134), the Fair Campaign Practices Act (chapter 42.17 RCW). Laws of 1993, ch. 2, §§ 1-36. The legislature passed RCW 42.17.640 and RCW 42.17.660 to implement this initiative. Laws of 1993, ch.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. Washington Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Edelman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Edelman v. STATE EX REL. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Association of Washington Business v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Utter v. Building Industry Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.