Legal Opinion

Edelman v. State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2004No. 74152-2PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

We granted review to determine whether the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) exceeded its authority in promulgating WAC 390-16-311 to interpret a perceived ambiguity in RCW 42.17.660. Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeals held that the PDC exceeded its authority in making a rule that alters an unambiguous statute. We affirm.

*587BACKGROUND

In 1992, the people of Washington passed Initiative 134 (1-134), the Fair Campaign Practices Act (chapter 42.17 RCW). Laws of 1993, ch. 2, §§ 1-36. The legislature passed RCW 42.17.640 and RCW 42.17.660 to implement this initiative. Laws of 1993, ch.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. Washington Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Edelman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Edelman v. STATE EX REL. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Association of Washington Business v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Utter v. Building Industry Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sources for Sustainable Communities v. Building Industry Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API