Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mahoney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2003No. 02-35112; D.C. No. CV-96-00066-TGNPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Anthel L. Brown and Dewey W. Coleman appeal the district court’s denial of their petition for a writ of habeas corpus.1 Because the petitioners cannot show that the state court decision denying them relief was contrary to or an unreasonable application of United States Supreme Court precedent, we affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Jurisdiction

A pro se appellant must personally sign the notice of appeal in order for the court to have jurisdiction to consider his claims.2 In the present case, only petitioner Brown signed the Notice of Appeal. Coleman’s failure to sign the Notice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gloria Killian v. Susan Poole, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roy v. Pioneer Human Resources IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API