Legal Opinion

Eyerman v. Second National Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J,

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

Herman Eechtien was county treasurer of St. Louis County before and at the time when the scheme of separation went into effect, and the plaintiff was one of the sureties on his official bond. He had, at the same time, on deposit in the National Bank of the State of Missouri, the sum of $17,705.28 belonging to the school fund of the old county. Afterwards, the proper authorities of the new eounty, and of the city of St. Louis, made a joint demand upon Eechtien for these moneys, but were refused payment. The same authorities thereupon instituted a suit upon his official bond, on the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  2. Thornton v. RankinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. Fletcher v. SchaumburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  4. Ranney v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  5. Renshaw v. WillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horigan Realty Co. v. First National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Hale v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  3. William R. Compton Co. v. Farmers Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Eyerman v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. School Dist. of City of Sedalia v. De WeeseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API