Legal Opinion

Laribee v. City of Rome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1998No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of City of Rome, Rome Hospital & Murphy Memorial Hospital and Rome Hospital Obstetrical Center (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Defendants established that the treating physicians were not their employees and that defendants thus are not vicariously liable (see, Hill v St. Clare’s Hosp., 67 NY2d 72, 79). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. St. Clare's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Millard v. Alliance Laundry Systems, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Moticik v. HealthcareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Golden v. Pavlov-ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Jaycox v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. GOLDEN, KENNETH P. v. PAVLOV-SHAPIRO, MD, SASHAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API