Henning v. Fisher
West Virginia Supreme Court
An appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Greenbrier County. Tlie opinion of the Court sufficiently states the facts. The Circuit Court should have dismissed the Plaintiff's bill. 1st. The Plaintiff having voluntarily executed his ¡bond to the Defendant, Moss, who was not a party to the sale of the house and lot, a Court of Equity can afford him no relief. • 2nd.
Read the full summary
An appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Greenbrier County. Tlie opinion of the Court sufficiently states the facts. The Circuit Court should have dismissed the Plaintiff's bill. 1st. The Plaintiff having voluntarily executed his ¡bond to the Defendant, Moss, who was not a party to the sale of the house and lot, a Court of Equity can afford him no relief. • 2nd. The hill fails to aver any foot tending to show that the deed from Kincaid to Fisher was not duly recorded in 1863. 3rd. The recitals of the*bill do not show the existance of any specified judgments, or liens upon the house and lot; and,…
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Judge.
On the 17th day of May, 1871, Thomas A. Henning filed his bill with injunction, before the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County, against William Fisher, Samuel Kincaid and Henry W. Moss, with exhibits, alleging that at the April term of said Court, on the law side, a. judgment was rendered against him upon two bonds in favor of Henry W. Moss, for §660.35, with interest thereon, from the 18th day of April, 1871, until paid, and costs of suit,'amounting to $17.13; that the bonds were given in part for a house and lot in the town of Lewisburg purchased by him from William Fisher, who…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Clay v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
- State ex rel. W. H. Wheeler & Co. v. ShawkeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- McClure v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878