Legal Opinion

Spatz v. Pulensky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment and resulted in judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $5,000 damages and interest from the 17th day of January, 1942, the date when the contract was breached, to the date of the entry of judgment, December 27, 1943, and the judgment as entered contained appropriate provisions for such relief. Plaintiff’s attorney incorrectly computed the interest at $227.50 instead of at the sum of $583.33. He then applied to the Rensselaer Special Term of the Supreme Court (Sehiriek, J.) for an order amending and correcting the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Urband v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yamamoto v. CostelloNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fehlhaber Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Feldman v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API