Legal Opinion
Brown v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 26, 1995No. 14-94-00124-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
This is an asbestos case. Appellants, collectively referred to as the “Workers,” filed suit against Pittsburgh Corning Corporation to recover damages for personal injury and death caused by exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the corporation. A jury failed to find the company’s products were defective or that the company was negligent. Consistent with that verdict, the trial court entered a take-nothing judgment. The Workers bring one point of error. They contend that jury panelist Charles Lee Young, whom they challenged for cause, was disqualified…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hallett v. Houston Northwest Medical CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Beall v. Ditmore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
- Beavers v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
- Born v. Virginia City Dance Hall & SaloonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Lopez v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- Anita Laven v. THBN, LLC and Sean Arnold, Individually and as Trustee of the Anita R. Laven 20334 Desert Willow Land Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc., D/B/A Bossier Country v. Bryan Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- Brown v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Jack Zeev Yetiv v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.