Legal Opinion

Frederick M. Dagampat v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1965No. 19681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAVARES, District Judge.

On July 15, 1964, the Federal Grand Jury for the Southern District of California returned a five-count indictment against appellant, charging violations of the federal narcotics laws. At the outset of his trial, appellant moved to suppress evidence, consisting of marijuana and marked money, that had been seized at the time of his arrest without a warrant.

The motion to suppress was based upon contentions raised by appellant on this appeal: that there was no reasonable cause to arrest appellant without a warrant, or, if there was reasonable cause, that the officers’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Clara Bell HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Arthur Wartson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Clara Bell HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Clara Bell HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API