Legal Opinion
United States v. David Allan Amos, United States of America v. David Allan Amos
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1991No. 91-1338, 91-1525PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
David Allan Amos appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse by force in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(1). The Government appeals Amos’s sentence. We affirm Amos’s conviction, but remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
At his trial, Amos requested the district court to instruct the jury on sexual abuse, 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1), and sexual abuse of a minor, 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a), as lesser included offenses of aggravated sexual abuse by force. The district court declined to give Amos’s requested instructions. On appeal Amos contends he was denied due…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Earl Samuel Stuart and Jerome Olen HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Herbert James Eagle Thunder, United States of America v. Hobart William GarneauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kim Allen WillisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Brian John TibesarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Tomas Rodriguez, Also Known as Tomas Rodriguez-Ledezma, Also Known as Tomas Ledezma RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William King, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Daniel RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Santiago Maul-ValverdeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.