Legal Opinion

Caddo Central Oil & Refining Corp. v. Boat-Right & Cheesman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J-.

Appellees, plaintiffs below, compose a partnership doing business as Boatright & Cheesman, and for their cause of action alleged that in July, 1921, they were engaged in Union County in drilling for oil under a contract with an oil company on a lease known as the Pratt lease. That at the same time appellant, a corporation, the defendant below, was preparing ’to operate on an adjoining lease known as the Fitzgerald lease. That in drilling operations great care must be exercised to prevent disasters from fire, the character of the work making necessary the presence of inflammable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blair v. Inhabitants of PelhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. The People v. . BuddensieckNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Church v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Zinn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Arkansas Mutual Fire Insurance v. StuckeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McFadden v. A. B. Richards Medicine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API