Legal Opinion

Doe v. Steele

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 11, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01818Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-1818-MMA (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 CISSY STEELE, et al., [Doc. No. 25] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against multiple Defendants alleging that 19 she was targeted and groomed “for the sole purpose of sex trafficking her, in violation of 20 the [Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act].” Doc. No. 12 (“FAC”) ¶ 1. 21 A group of Defendants—Diabolic Video Productions, Inc. (“Diabolic”); Black Ice…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API