In re Proceedings for the Condemnation of a Fee Simple Interest in Land Owned by: Lee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Respondents assign as error the denial of their motion for a directed verdict and the denial of their post-trial motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial. Respondents also contend that the trial court erred in admitting certain expert testimony for the petitioner and in failing to instruct the jury on the proper measure of damages to be applied.
Respondents first argue that petitioner had no compensable interest in the condemned property. We disagree. The document executed by the Lees and petitioner in 1967 gave Becker the exclusive right to enter onto the land and to mine the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Indian Creek Marble Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
- Council v. . SanderlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Georgia Kaolin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CatoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NAT. GAS CO., INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Ferguson v. Ddp Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- In Re LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Martin v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.