Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael H. Said

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 8, 2021No. 20-0797Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 20–0797 Submitted September 17, 2020—Filed January 8, 2021 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. MICHAEL H. SAID, Respondent. On review of the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board charged an attorney with multiple violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, including violations related to competence, diligence, promptness, client disclosures and communication, conflict of interest, and charging unreasonable fees, the grievance commission recommended public…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Octavia Beltran-Tirado,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API