Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 2011No. COA11-45PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Jeffrey Scott Mathis and Shirley Clifton Mathis and defendant Susan Belinda Hoffman are owners of two adjoining parcels of land. In December 2004, plaintiffs hired, a contractor to construct a fence between the two parcels. The cost of the fence to plaintiffs was over $15,000. In August 2008, plaintiffs learned that, after defendant and her daughter ran a string along what they believed to be the property boundary, defendant contended the fence had been built on her property. Shortly thereafter, defendant had the property surveyed to determine the true property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robins v. Town of HillsboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Siskron v. Temel-Peck Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Adams v. Beard Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carolyn Louise Gunn Testamentary Tr. v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API