Glick v. Glick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
The master recommended a divorce on the ground of indignities: The court below-dismissed exceptions, entered a decree and the wife-defendant has taken this appeal.
- Plaintiff testified that the difficulties between the parties aróse in part from the inability of the defendant to engage in normal intercourse because of the physical malformation of defendant’s genitalia; that because of this physical condition defendant made per sistent demands upon plaintiff to engage in unnatural intercourse; that plaintiff at all times refused to accede to defendant’s demands; that he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Martin v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wasson v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Sacks v. SacksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Hargrove v. HargroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Zirot v. ZirotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Van Houten v. Van HoutenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.