Legal Opinion

Contino v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, insofar as it affirmed the judgment entered upon the decision at Trial Term, reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division, and the case remitted to Supreme Court, Nassau County, with directions to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant declaring the Building Zone Ordinance of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead constitutional insofar as it applies to the plaintiffs’ property.

All concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. CDK Restaurant, Inc. v. KrucklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Petersen v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Krueger v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Schrade v. WaringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API