Legal Opinion

Afamasaga v. Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2018No. 17-9528PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Submitted on the briefs: *

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Paulo Afamasaga, a native and citizen of Samoa, entered the United States on a nonimmigrant tourist visa and remained beyond the date authorized. After he pleaded guilty to making a false statement when applying for an American passport , see 18 U.S.C. § 1542 , the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) successfully initiated removal proceedings against him. Mr. Afamasaga applied for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, but the immigration judge (IJ) deemed him ineligible on the ground that violating § 1542 is a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Browder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rodriguez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Hernandez-Carrera v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Banuelos-Galviz v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Lujan-Jimenez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. ZaziDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  4. Garcia-Morales v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Hernandez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API