Dickinson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix to vacate a judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed thereon. The sole predicate for the motion to vacate is that appellant was not represented by counsel. The order denying the motion to vacate finds that this is a false predicate and a transcript of the proceedings before the court fully substantiates that conclusion.
The record reveals that the appellant, when arraigned upon a charge of breaking and entering an automobile (Section 810.051, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.),…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Albert E. Paschal v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Pitts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Shellman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Donald Harold Bartz v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Dade County Classroom Teachers' Ass'n. v. RubinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.