Legal Opinion

McMorry v. Ryan

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 22, 1902No. 273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside the verdict of a jury and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court upon defendant’s motion for a new trial, it having been decided by the jury in favor of the plaintiff.

Where there is a conflict of testimony, the court ought not to set the verdict of a jury aside and grant a new trial, even though the judge would have reached a different verdict upon the same evidence. Where, however, the jury render a verdict upon evidence insufficient to justify it, or in violation of the law, it is the duty of the judge to set it aside and grant a new trial. The motion in this action is based upon the in*517sufficien…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnette v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1904
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API