Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Centani v. Marrero

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1915No. 6512Published

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, No. 1929. Honorable P. E. Edrington, Judge.

1Opinion

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

The plaintiff in his argument for a rehearing has not convinced us of any error in our original opinion. We can only give more extended reasons for our conclusions.

In the case of the Acme Lumber Co., 115 La., 893, the Supreme Court said: “The legal right (to a mandamus) must be shown, and it must appear that there is no other specific legal remedy to which he can resort for the enforcement of his remedy (rights).” C. P., 830.

In the case of Sommierville, 111 La., 1015, the Court said: -“Nor will the writ…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API