Legal Opinion
Emerson v. Magendantz
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided February 26, 1997No. 95-306-AppealPublished
1Opinion of the Court
689 A.2d 409 (1997)
Diane EMERSON et al.
v.
Henry MAGENDANTZ, M.D., et al.
No. 95-306-Appeal.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
February 26, 1997.
Paul S. Cantor, Providence, for Plaintiffs.
R. Kelly Sheridan, Adam C. Robitaille, Providence, for Defendants.
OPINION
WEISBERGER, Chief Justice.
This case comes before us on questions of law certified by a justice of the Superior Court in response to a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure filed by the defendant, Henry Magendantz, M.D., in opposition to a complaint of plaintiffs, Diane Emerson and Thomas F.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.