Legal Opinion
Frederick O. Silver v. Capital One N.A., et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 29, 2026No. 3:25-cv-05175Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 FREDERICK O. SILVER, CASE NO. 3:25-cv-05175-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 CAPITAL ONE N.A., et al., (DKT. NO. 98) 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed a motion for leave to file 17 a third amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 98.) Plaintiff seeks to add Equifax Information Services 18 LLC (“Equifax”) and TransUnion LLC (“TransUnion”) as additional defendants and “clarify” 19 his existing Fair…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.