United States v. Chodak
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In these two criminal informations the defendants, engaged in the business of selling used automobiles, are charged with the violation of Maximum Price Regulation No. 540, Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., Section 2(a) (4) of Regulation No. 540, by the alleged sale and delivery of a described automobile at a price of $225 higher than the maximum, price permitted by the Regulations. The defendants have respectively moved to suppress certain written and documentary evidence seized and taken from their possession in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- McBride v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- John Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. HaydenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Gunter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.