Legal Opinion

State v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1953No. 43744PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 S.W.2d 584 (1953)

STATE

v.

BRADFORD.

No. 43744.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 1.

November 9, 1953.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Denied December 14, 1953.

Harry T. Limerick, Jr., Columbia, for appellant.

John M. Dalton, Atty. Gen., David Donnelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Court en Banc Denied December 14, 1953.

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of forcible rape. The information also contained averments under the Habitual Criminal Act. Section 556.280 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. The jury apparently disregarded the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Turner v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Harris v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. State v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. State v. RappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API