Legal Opinion

United States v. Dale Brown Robert Chung Gussie Reicher Rolando Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 1995No. 18-14329PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACK, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Dale Brown, Robert Chung, Gussie Reicher, and Rolando Sanchez challenge their convictions for conspiracy to smuggle cocaine, conspiracy to possess cocaine and, in Appellant Brown’s case, two counts of hash oil distribution. On appeal, Brown and Reicher assert two errors related to their entrapment defense. First, they argue that the Government’s evidence of predisposition was insufficient as a matter of law, entitling them to judgments of acquittal. Second, Appellants insist that the pattern entrapment instruction given by the district court misstated the law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach ShoresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. GamacheCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. DemarestCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Terrance RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API