Legal Opinion

DiCandido v. Mazzer

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 7, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00364Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MICHELLE DICANDIDO, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:20-cv-364 (VAB) MATTHEW MAZZER AND ENTERPRISE FM TRUST, Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND Michelle DiCandido (“Plaintiff”) has sued Matthew Mazzer and Enterprise FM Trust (collectively, “Defendants”) in Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Litchfield at Torrington, after an alleged car crash. Compl., ECF No. 1-1 at 5–8 (Feb. 7, 2020). Ms. DiCandido alleges that Defendants, as a result of their negligence, violated

Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-299

and 14-218a. Defendants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API