Legal Opinion

Hopgood v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1983No. 83—93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

This interlocutory appeal is brought by the defendants, Manufacturers’ Railway Company (hereinafter MRC) and St. Louis Refrigerator Car Company (hereinafter SLRC), pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308). The plaintiff, Stanley Hopgood, an employee of SLRC, was injured during the course of his employment with SLRC and brought suit against SLRC, MRC, and AnheuserBusch, Inc. (hereinafter Busch), pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. sec. 51 et seq. (1976)) (hereinafter FELA), which provides for the liability of common carriers by railroad, in interstate or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Edwards v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Eckel v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Larson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Larson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Stambaugh v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API