Legal Opinion
Fourt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1956No. 5255PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Westinghouse Electric Supply Company in the amount of $2,660.97 against Ralph L. Fourt, prime contractor and the latter’s corporate surety, American Bonding Company. The suit was brought under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., and pertains to a contract entered into between Fourt and the United States to convert a certain building at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, into a Training Aid Sub-center. Fourt, in turn, sub-let the furnishing and installation of electrical materials to one Clevenger. Clevenger, during the periods…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Endebrock-White CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Fourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Slagle-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Landis Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.