Legal Opinion

Whitt v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1978No. 77-246PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal concerns an action based upon an allegedly written contract of employment. The trial Court, sitting without a jury, found that Appellants-Defendants, James H. Whitt and Whitt Contractors, Inc., were liable for money due under the contract in the sum of $18,365. We affirm.

It is undisputed that under an employment contract Adron McConnell, Plaintiff-Appellee, began work for Whitt (and later Whitt Contractors) in February or March, 1972. He worked as a construction superintendent for Appellants until April 15, 1976, at which time the work "ran out." Originally, McConnell was paid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Kubiszyn v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. King v. BrindleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Baptist Foundation of Alabama v. PennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. CHARLES ISRAEL CHEV., INC. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Boswell v. BoswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Waters v. Union Bank of ReptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. City of Bridgeport v. Citizens Action CommitteeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. AAA Sewing MacH. Co. v. Shelby Finance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API