Legal Opinion

L. & N. R. R. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 20, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

CASE 98. — PROSECUTION AGAINST THE LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAIIJIOAD COMPANY. — Appeal from Barren Circuit Court. Samuel.E. Jones, Circuit Judge. Defendant convicted and appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Of’nion of the Court by

Judge Lassing

Reversing-

The Louisville & Nashville Bailroad Company was indicted, under section 772 of the Kentucky Statutes, for failing to provide a convenient and suitable water-closet or privy, and keep and maintain same *804in decent order and repair at its station at Glasgow Junction. Under a plea of not guilty the company was tried by a jury, found guilty as charged, and its punishment fixed at a fine of $250. Judgment was entered upon this verdict and the company appeals.

Several grounds are relied upon for reversing, but the only one which we find it necessary to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Louisville & Interurban Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API